<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									AFGE TSA Council 100 Forum - Recent Posts				            </title>
            <link>https://afgecouncil100.org/community/</link>
            <description>AFGE TSA Council 100 Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:25:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>Answer to: Cba and breaks</title>
                        <link>https://afgecouncil100.org/community/main-forum/cba-and-breaks/#post-7</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello,
As you mentioned, the section you&#039;re referenced is highlighted in yellow. If you look at the bottom of the page it states, &quot;Note: Highlighted sections are not agreed to and have been...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>As you mentioned, the section you're referenced is highlighted in yellow. If you look at the bottom of the page it states, "<em>Note: Highlighted sections are not agreed to and have been submitted to arbitration.</em>" This means that the section is not agreed to and we must now go down at the next level of TSA policy which is TSA MD. If you visit the TSA SharePoint site you can find all the TSA MD's under the "MD &amp; Forms" tab at the top.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://afgecouncil100.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Webmaster Council 100</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://afgecouncil100.org/community/main-forum/cba-and-breaks/#post-7</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Cba and breaks</title>
                        <link>https://afgecouncil100.org/community/main-forum/cba-and-breaks/#post-6</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello,
This is in regards to:
Page 23 CBA, section F bullet point 8. 
this states that breaks should not be within first or last hour, and lunches shouldn’t be within first or last 3 hour...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>This is in regards to:</p>
<p>Page 23 CBA, section F bullet point 8. <br /><br /></p>
<p>this states that breaks should not be within first or last hour, and lunches shouldn’t be within first or last 3 hours. However this paragraph is highlighted and has strike out below. Does this mean it is not being enforced? Do we have protections over the time breaks and lunches are scheduled?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://afgecouncil100.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Janedoe123</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://afgecouncil100.org/community/main-forum/cba-and-breaks/#post-6</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Pay Equity Conversion Graph and Concerns</title>
                        <link>https://afgecouncil100.org/community/pay-equity-forum/pay-equity-conversion-graph-and-concerns/#post-2</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello everybody,
I have created a graph which highlights some concerns with the recent conversion progress used for the pay equity.  In short, it seems that many long-term employees, especi...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everybody,</p>
<p>I have created a graph which highlights some concerns with the recent conversion progress used for the pay equity.  In short, it seems that many long-term employees, especially TSO's, were not converted in an equitable fashion, even though they may have received significant raises.  Please take a look at it and your comments would be appreciated.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Paul Uecker</p>
<p>Vice President, Greater Minnesota</p>
<p>AFGE Local 899</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://afgecouncil100.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Paul Uecker</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://afgecouncil100.org/community/pay-equity-forum/pay-equity-conversion-graph-and-concerns/#post-2</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		